ConductormacOS workforce manager
Starts at Free · Pro from $50/mo
A polished macOS app for running Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode in parallel, each task in its own workspace and branch with a dedicated terminal, diff and review path. Since July 2026 the paid tiers add Conductor Cloud — the same workspaces running in hosted Vercel sandboxes — plus early-access multiplayer, stacked branches, an API and a Conductor MCP server.
Pick it if You live on a Mac, want the smoothest turnkey parallel-agent experience, and are happy for the hosted half to run on someone else’s servers.
macOS-only desktop, with no Windows or Linux build; per-task diff review with open-PR, stack and merge actions rather than a full review cockpit; Conductor Cloud runs workspaces in hosted Vercel sandboxes and self-hosting is announced but unshipped; multiplayer, the admin portal and SSO are paid tiers (Pro $50/mo, Teams $60/user/mo, Enterprise custom), and the mobile app is still listed as coming soon.
Control Center vs Conductor →
SupersetParallel agent desktop
Starts at Free · teams from $15/user
A source-available desktop app (Elastic License 2.0) built to run a hundred-plus CLI coding agents in parallel — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Gemini CLI and anything else that runs in a terminal — each in its own git worktree and branch. It adds a built-in diff reviewer, SSH-backed remote workspaces that survive a sleeping laptop, a CLI/SDK for CI, and cron-style automations.
Pick it if You want maximum parallelism under a lightweight dashboard, and nothing else in the way.
Source-available under the Elastic License 2.0 — the desktop app is free forever, but it is not OSI open source; macOS is the only tested platform (the Linux x64 AppImage is experimental, Windows is unreleased and the iOS app is “coming soon”); automations are scheduled agent sessions, not DAG pipelines; the $15/user/month team plan is a billing tier rather than shared workspaces.
Control Center vs Superset →
OrcaAgent development environment
Starts at Free · open source
An MIT-licensed Agent Development Environment (ADE) from Stably: 40+ CLI agents in parallel, every task in its own git worktree with its own terminal and embedded Chromium tab. Desktop ships for macOS, Windows and Linux with iOS and Android companions, agents can run on SSH targets or self-hosted Orca servers, and the GitHub surface now covers inline review, checks, stacked PRs and merge.
Pick it if You want a free, cross-platform agent IDE with a phone companion, browser-per-task isolation and the most complete pull-request surface in this table — without tickets, meetings or an operation around it.
Review is complete on GitHub (inline comments, checks, stacked PRs with atomic stack merge and merge-queue support) and thinner on GitLab; “self-hosted Orca servers” are remote compute targets agents run on, not a server your clients read state from; automations are scheduled runs, not DAG pipelines; no human multiplayer, tickets or meetings.
Control Center vs Orca →
Starts at Free · open source
An MIT-licensed platform that wraps AI agents in a company structure: org charts with reporting lines, per-agent monthly budgets that pause at 100%, board-level approval for hiring and strategy, and goals every task traces back to. It runs as a single Node process with an embedded Postgres and no required account, agent-agnostic across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Hermes, OpenClaw and Pi.
Pick it if You want to model an organization of agents — budgets, goals, governance — more than a coding workflow.
Fully self-hosted — one Node process, embedded Postgres, no Paperclip account — with heartbeat and event-driven wake-ups rather than DAG pipelines; a web UI rather than native desktop or phone clients; the team metaphor is an org of agents, not human multiplayer; no git worktrees or review surface.
Control Center vs Paperclip →
MulticaPM for human + agent teams
Starts at Free · cloud on request
A self-hostable project-management platform that treats coding agents as teammates: assign an issue the way you’d assign it to a colleague and the agent picks it up, reports blockers and hands it back for review. A Go daemon auto-detects the 23 CLIs you already have installed, behind a Next.js web app, an Electron desktop app on all three platforms and a CLI.
Pick it if You want task assignment and progress tracking for agents inside a PM workflow you already understand.
The “Multica License” is Apache 2.0 plus conditions — no hosted service for third parties, no commercial embedding without a licence, and the branding has to stay — so source-available rather than OSI open source. Self-hostable by Docker Compose, single binary or Kubernetes (a hosted cloud exists but publishes no pricing); a PM surface, with no worktree isolation, review cockpit or phone client.
Control Center vs Multica →
Control CenterDeveloper operations deck
Starts at Free · self-hosted
One native app for the whole operation: a fleet of agents (built-in runtime plus eight CLI adapters) across copy-on-write worktrees, a PR review cockpit, tickets with Linear sync, DAG pipelines, meetings, calendar, memory and a code graph — with multiplayer roles, presence and per-space autonomy. One cc_server you own; desktop, web and phone as thin clients.
Pick it if You want the agents and the operation around them — review, tickets, pipelines, meetings — on one deck you host yourself, on every screen you own.
Download
